butchcommunist:

butchcommunist:

butchcommunist:

butchcommunist:

butchcommunist:

Department of Health and Human Services is expected to roll out a division specifically to protect the moral and religious (as in, no need to point to specific religious doctrine) rights of individuals to object to say, performing an abortion, or treating a trans or gnc person, or assisting an openly gay patient lmao. I hate this country and also Christianity.

Cue LGBT people sitting for hours in emergency rooms because nobody in a particular region is morally okay with physically touching them

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-administration-creating-civil-rights-division-to-shield-health-workers-with-moral-or-religious-objections/2018/01/17/5663d1c0-fbe2-11e7-8f66-2df0b94bb98a_story.html

Also notable is Trump’s recent confirmation of the conservative, anti-abortion, very newly former Eli Lilly pharmaceutical executive Alex Nazar to the position of Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Again, this is part of a pattern of the administration’s decisions to lean in the direction of so-called religious freedom over access to healthcare, especially for women and LGBT (especially trans, noting the CDC’s recent suggestion to employees writing for budgets not to use words like “fetus” and “transgender”) people.

When asked during his confirmation hearing in November whether he supports a Trump administration rule, currently blocked from implementation by federal courts, allowing insurers to not cover women’s health insurances due to moral or religious objections, he said,
I do believe we have to balance of course a woman’s choice of insurance
that she would want with the conscience of employers and others
.”
This came soon after the Trump HHS changed its strategic plan
to indicate that fetuses have personhood
. Nazar wrote that he
supports this change, writing, “The mission of HHS is to enhance the
health and well-being of all Americans, and this includes the unborn.

For reference that means the HHS’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) job now includes ensuring that this

is legal nationwide. As of my writing this, 4/25/2018, the Office of Civil Rights website makes no mention of “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” on its list of protected groups.

You can learn how not to be a LGBT ally by looking at what happened at Glasgow Pride

femsaphique:

tolbiac110:

femsaphique:

So while this article obviously isn’t perfectly written, it has some good points. Such as the fact that police are now attacking us for hate speech, while letting bigots picket us.

I’ll take some parts of the article I think are relevant.

One of this group held a placard with the slogan “Faggots fight fascism”.

According to the police event commander, Chief Inspector Alan
Bowater: “Numerous complaints were made from members of the public and
organisers of the event in reference to the banner, which was described
as offensive and inappropriate.”
This apparently justified both the
police response and charging that individual with a homophobic hate
crime.

Compare and contrast this action with the “quiet word” that police
had with some Christian placard-wavers who really were homophobic: whose
presence, despite causing alarm, and being described as intimidating by
several marchers
, was still OK.

Or as many have parsed that: bigoted Christian free speech good; radical queer speech, bad.

As always, it is not the initial incident but the response that
matters. Police are welcome at Pride. But it takes a degree of
monumental stupidity to fail to see how them leading Pride – in uniform!
– is never going to fly.

Ditto taking down LGBT protesters. Ditto policing LGBT language.

The feeling, from talking to many there and in Scotland, is that this
represents a significant setback to police-LGBT relations
. Not fatal.
But not small either.

There is now an on-going social media spat between the organisers and
many in the LGBT community
. The NUS, Equality Network and Scottish
Trans Alliance have condemned police actions.

The real problem, though, is police insistence that they did nothing
wrong
. Which is great media strategy, but awful if you want to be
friends and allies.

Is this really what we want our events to be? Us calling ourselves faggots means we need to be assaulted and arrested for bigotry, but people can say we can go to Hell and it’s all fine?

The police come to police our identities, our language, and our politics, and we’re meant to expect they’re there to protect us? Once we do anything to challenge anything, some of us get put in head-lock and get arrested, for hate crime against ourselves.

While we’re wearing rainbow clothing we are read as bigots, meanwhile there’s Christian fundamentalists calling for our extermination down the street – apparently not discriminating or being hateful.

The way pride events are organised in the UK seriously needs to be challenged and changed. Because the way us faggots and trans activists are treated is disgusting.

Say whatever you want about slurs or what language is and isn’t offensive, but when people endanger others over reclaiming words, by calling police over and complaining, then you’re actually taking it way too far.

Repression of radical queers has been and will be derived from the ideals of liberals and their sensibilities of policing, free speech (even in a space of marginalized people) and the continuity of the spectacle of incrementalism.

If you ask me, this calls for heightened counter-demonstration tactics. Insurrection at pride even, if circumstances are ideal. I’m beyond done with liberals running to the cops, putting people in danger and then blaming us when they get called out.

The fact these put would go as far as getting some people in our community arrested, put in headlock, and charged for hatecrime over calling ourselves faggots, really just shows how the neoliberal position on identity politics is dangerous and irresponsible, doesn’t it?

You can learn how not to be a LGBT ally by looking at what happened at Glasgow Pride